#Sigma 105mm macro vs sony 90mm macro series
With image quality results practically equal to Canon’s series L, the stabilized Sigma is certainly good enough to be considered by fully serious player in this lens catagory. Hi there, I am considering buying a macro lens for my Sony A7ll. 5th place at 18: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM.4rd place at 23 (tie): Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO Canon and Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG Macro Canon.
3rd place at 24: Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Canon.2nd place at 25: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM.1st place at 28: Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T 100mm f/2 ZE Canon.By raising its prices, however, Sigma has lost some of its advantage over Nikon and Canon in terms of quality-to-price ratio.īelow is a summary of our updated scorecard (available at 100mm macros for full-frame cameras): Note that the prices for professional-quality Sigma lenses have risen significantly. One other good point is that stabilization hasn’t added any more weight to the lens. This said, we acknowledge that there’s been at least a little improvement in sharpness and transmittion. Verdict: After all this time, we frankly hoped for greater advances in image quality. We’ll test those two soon enough, but today, here’s a comparison of a half dozen popular macro lenses already on the market. Stronger vignetting (1.5 EV to f/2.8) for the stabilized version I’ve tested a lot of macro lenses for Nikon cameras recently, which is lucky timing given the upcoming 50mm and 105mm Z-series macro lenses.The stabilized version is ever-so-slightly brighter.Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art Lens (Sony E) You Pay: 799.00. Very close DxOMark scores - only 1 point (Canon) and 2 points (Nikon) separate these two lenses Comparing Sony FE 90mm f 2.8 Macro G OSS Lens vs Sigma 105mm f.
0 kommentar(er)
